Traction Maculopathy
Macular
Hole
Cellophane
Maculopathy
Macular
Pucker
On
Removing Traction From the Macula
By
Robert Morris, MD and C. Douglas Witherspoon, MD
The
Helen Keller Foundation for Research and Education
The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Ophthalmology
Birmingham,
Alabama, USA.
The
Problem:
Several forces can pull on the macula, wrinkle or displace the
retina, and cause distortion of vision. There are several causes
of macular traction.
Vitreomacular traction syndrome, cellophane maculopathy, epimacular
proliferation, and macular hole are estimated to occur in 6.4%
of the U.S. population over age 50 Thus, as many as 2.5 million
persons in the US alone to some degree exhibit a form of age-related
macular degeneration secondary to traction (traction ARMD).
Causes
of Traction Maculopathy:
1.
The normal eye is filled with a gel called vitreous. When the
vitreous gel liquefies with age, it often detaches (falls off)
the back of the eye (macula). This process called "vitreous
detachment" typically causes either no symptoms, flashes
of light, floaters, or retinal detachment (rarely). Sometimes,
the detaching vitreous can stick to the macula, pull on the
macular retina, and cause a macular
hole. This is called vitreomacular traction syndrome.
2.
There is a second (more common) way the macula can be pulled
or wrinkled. Cellophane maculopathy,
macular pucker, and macular hole can
also be caused by a gradual process of scarring of the inner
surface (lining) of the retina. This scarring forms
was is termed an "epiretinal membrane."
Traction and scarring of the macular retina at first produces
distortion and eventual loss of vision. Fluorescein angiogram
can show leaking of affected blood vessels which can be reversed
by surgery. This is important because leaking blood vessels
can cause macular edema (swelling) particularly in diabetic
eyes. This is also important because chronic edema can result
in irreversible cystic retinal changes, foveal cysts and macular
holes.
Unlike
the typical "wet" and "dry" ARMD where the
problem occurs beneath the retina, in Traction Maculopathy (ARMD)
the retinal surface is affected first. Also unlike typical ARMD,
Traction Maculopathy due to epiretinal membrane formation is
largely reversible (if treated early). It is important to note
that while traction maculopathy may present as slightly distorted
vision, it can gradually progress to reduce best corrected visual
acuity to 20/200 (0.1, legal blindness). Lastly, Traction
maculopathy affects both eyes in 10 to 30% of cases.
Treatment:
Epiretinal
Membrane Surgery: In 1976, Machemer first removed
epiretinal membranes during vitrectomy. Throughout the 1980's,
removal of epiretinal membranes became more common, and macular
surgery began to constitute an ever larger percentage of vitrectomies
performed. The daunting challenge of restoring foveal function
by traction release became a necessary part of each vitreoretinal
surgeon's repertoire. In fact, it requires the most delicate
hand movements of any surgery on the human body.
Macular Hole Surgery: In
1991, Kelly and Wendel first reported successful closure of
macular holes with substantial return of visual acuity. The
pace of progress in our understanding of both the vitreoretinal
interface and of traction maculopathy and its treatment quickened
significantly, as innovative surgeons endeavored to improve
upon the author's reported 50% anatomical hole closure rate.
The
Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM):
Morris, Kuhn, and Witherspoon have suggested that removal of
the entire macular ILM could be followed by long term, stable
and excellent visual acuity. By 1993, They began using a procedure
we called "ILM Maculorhexis" in the treatment of macular hole
and epimacular proliferation. In 1994, we further predicted
that removal of the internal limiting membrane might become
an important part of surgery for all forms of traction maculopathy.
Subsequent advocates of ILM removal such as Drs. Logan Brooks,
Tom Rice, Tony Capone, Robert Wendel, and Claus Eckhardt, reported
higher rates of macular hole closure with good visual results.
Because the removal of ILM was technically difficult and prolonged
macular surgery, and because of the possibility that it might
affect the underlying neurosensory retina, ILM removal remained
controversial.
We believe that the experienced surgeon can successfully identify
and remove the ILM. Intraoperative
identification of the ILM has improved with the use of indocyanine
green (ICG) ILM staining technique as described by Kim and Clark
in 1999. The ILM direct-view forceps (Grieshaber), combined
with ICG staining, now make ILM removal much more predictable.
In
an effort to make ILM removal easier,
Morris and Witherspoon have developed the FILMS procedure. A
FILMS cannulaŞ is inserted under the ILM in the peripheral macula.
Using foot pedal control of a viscous fluid injector, viscoelastic
fluid is slowly injected, establishing a cleavage plane (bubble
or cyst) between the ILM and the remaining neurosensory retina.
A FILMS cyst develops at a rate controlled by the surgeon. No
hemorrhages were seen, probably reflecting the fact that there
is no mechanical pulling on the retina, but rather gentle tamponade
of the retina, as the ILM/EMP complex is elevated. The separated
tissue was then easily removed with forceps. FILMS was the first
surgery performed within the retina, separating the neurosensory
layers from all overlying pathologic tissue. After clinical
trials of the FILMS cannulaŞ and method, the device is expected
to be available for patient care.
Conclusion:
There
are several forces can pull on the macula, wrinkle or displace
the retina, causing distortion of vision. An experienced retinal
specialist can determine why there is retinal traction, when
to consider surgery, and what method to employ. Clearly, great
progress has been made over the last 20 years such that if caught
early, most patients can be treated for Traction Maculopathy
(macular hole, macular pucker, cellophane maculopathy).
The
FILMS microcannulaŞ is patented: US patent #6210357.
The FILMS surgical method is patented: US patent #6024719.
The authors have a financial interest in this product.
Additional information regarding macula surgery may be found
by visiting http://www.maculasurgery.com
References
1.
Gass JD: Idiopathic Senile Macular Hole - It's Early Stages
and Pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 629-39.
2. Pearlstone, AD: The incidence of idiopathic preretinal macular
gliosis, Ann Ophthalmol 17:378-380, 1985.
3. Machemer R. Die chirugische Entfemung von epiretinalen Makulamembranen(macular
pucker). (The surgical removal of epiretinal macular membranes
[macular puckers].) Klin Montatsbl Augenheilkd 1978;173:36-42.
4. McDonald, HR, Verre, WP, and Aaberg, TM: Surgical management
of idiopathic epiretinal membranes, Ophthalmology 93:978-983,
1986.
5. Sivalingam, A, Eagle, RC, Jr, Duker, JS, Brown, GC, Benson,
WE, Annesby, WH, Jr and Federman, J: Visual Prognosis correlated
with the presence of internal-limiting membrane in histopathologic
specimens obtained from epiretinal membrane in surgery. Ophthalmology
97:1549-52, 1990.
6. Smiddy WE, Maguire AM, Green WR, et al. Idiopathic epiretinal
membranes: ultrastructural charactristics and clinicopathologic
correlation. Ophthalmology 1989;96:811-21.
7. Kelly, NE, Wendel, RT: Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular
holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 109:654-59,
1991.
8. Morris R, Kuhn F, Brown S, Feist R: Vitrectomy in Tersons
Syndrome: A report of 21 cases. Scientific paper 1990 American
Academy of Ophthalmology Meeting, Atlanta Ga, program page 130.
9. Morris, R, Witherspoon, C, Kuhn, F, Priester, B. Internal
Limiting Membrane (ILM) Maculorhexis for Traction Maculopathy.
VRST Vol. 8 No. 4, Winter 1997.
10. Morris, R, Kuhn, F, Witherspoon, CD. Hemorrhagic macular
cysts. Ophthalmology 1994;100:1.
11. Morris, R, Kuhn, F, Witherspoon, CD, Mester, V, Dooner,
J. Hemorrhagic Macular Cysts in Terson's Syndrome and its complications
for Macular Surgery in Wiedeman, P, Kohen, L (eds): Macular
and Retinal Diseases. Dev. Ophthalmol. Basel, Karger, 1997,
vol. 29, pp. 44-54.
12. Pollack, JS and Packo, KH. The 1999 Vitreous Society Preferences
and Trends (PAT) Survey. The Vitreous Society Annual Meeting;
September 21-25, 1999; Rome, Italy.
13. Witherspoon CD, Morris R, Fivgas GD, Nelson S, Mayne R:
Internal limiting membrane removal in the management of idiopathic
macular hole. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science,
Ft. Lauderdale, FL, program page S114,May 1999 meeting.
14. Kim, VY, Clark, JD. Indocyanine Green as an aid to membrane
peeling in Macular Hole Surgery. Scientific Poster, 1999 American
Academy of Ophthalmology Meeting, Orlando, Florida. 15. Boyd,
B: World Atlas Series of Ophthalmic Surgery, Vol.IV, Highlights
of Ophthalmology, 1999 Carvajal, S.A., pages 58-63. 16. Guidry
C. Isolation and characterization of porcine Muller Cells: Myofibroblastic
dedifferentiation in culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:740-752.
Go
To Home
Support
The EyeCare Foundation
Please
report any problems to:webmaster@macular-degeneration.org
While this WWW site is intended to provide general information
as a public service, the content is not intended to represent
official policies and practices of the institution or to substitute
for health care provided by a clinician. Content and design
copyright © Paul
T. Finger,MD, FACS
1999-2003
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED